ss-
you make a fair point, however i do believe roblox has never "sold" this
after "revivals" became a thing roblox basically allowed usage of this software

    McStealinYaBucket To add onto what I said, the icons used for the for show builders club icon, is made up of stock images from an asset library, which also falls under fair use and is not made by ROBLOX, along with many other assets on the website.

    wemz Still, it shouldn't be a big deal if the site owners made their own rendering engine. I mean, if they could re-create an entire ASP.NET website in PHP, they should be able to make their own rendering engine easily. It shouldn't be hard to stop using the 1 thing still holding them back.

    • wemz replied to this.

      please do not lock this thread, as i've seen instances of you doing such before
      we are providing solid evidence that the site in question did not use any illegally obtained materials nor was it harmful in any way

      i really hope you understand this time

      ss-
      i do assume that its for accuracy
      why would they risk making an inaccurate rendering system for their site when one already exists which is not illegal to use

      • ss- replied to this.

        wemz Because that one is still used today (in newer versions) by the company their site is based on?

        • wemz replied to this.

          wemz Most of the assets that we use from ROBLOX are not being used anymore and haven't been for years. Most of the items we plan to add on our catalog from ROBLOX are offsale on their site, meaning they don't care about them anymore.

          • wemz replied to this.

            McStealinYaBucket
            exactly

            serv00 admin, we are very sure that roblox corporation does not disallow such recreations of their old website

            ss-
            you make a good point, however, the new one is not leaked, and is in use by them
            whereas the old one is publicly available and does not represent roblox corporation's modern works

            ss-
            i'd also like to add that it takes times to make such remakes
            you must be really dedicated

            this is one of many reasons i do not agree with this hosting platform's decision to block the site
            it breaks no rules that i am aware of and any potential confusion has been cleared up already in this thread

            I looked inside the ROBLOX Terms Of Service and Privacy Policy and it says nothing about banning things that use ROBLOX assets under fair use.

              McStealinYaBucket
              yes
              nothing was monetized
              everything was remade from legally obtained assets and archives, and their own backend, and the footer gave credit to roblox corporation

                wemz We never said anything about making the assets that ROBLOX made. Nounblox only admited to making the things Nounblox ACTUALY made.

                • wemz replied to this.

                  McStealinYaBucket
                  yes
                  an acknowledgement that roblox was created by roblox corporation was even included at the bottom of every page

                  If this site has such a huge following that they will make a thread like this, it probably shouldn't be on a shared hosting website like Serv00.com.

                  • wemz replied to this.

                    the site was not used to carry out attacks or provide illegal downloads

                    ss-
                    you make a good point, but not everyone can afford a hoster or knows a paid one
                    they came to serv00 because it seemed like a great hoster with lots of capablities

                    ss-
                    i'd also like to add that we are all regular users of the "revival" that are all confused over the recent blocking

                    • ss- replied to this.